Skip to content
Concept visual of an agency client portal with a project kanban board, brand asset tiles and an approval checklist on a dark navy background.
AgencySpecified

Agency Portal

White-label client space for projects, approvals, assets and billing.

Modules
6
Journey steps
4
Integrations
4
Indicative build
6–10 weeks

How to read this page: Concept specification: this page documents a system TECH360 can build. It is not a delivered client project, a verified case study, a working demonstration or a measured outcome.

B · Problem & target users

What this system is designed to replace

  • Approvals happen in email threads nobody can search.
  • Deliverables and assets are scattered across drives.
  • Invoices and their status are discussed separately from the work.

Target users

  • Agency account managers
  • Client stakeholders
  • Finance

C · Objectives & intended benefits

Design intent, not measured outcomes

  • Give each client a scoped space containing their projects and approvals.
  • Record approvals against a named client identity.
  • Expose invoices and their status without emailing documents.

These are goals the build is designed to serve. No efficiency, revenue or conversion result is claimed.

D · Product overview

What the system is, and where it runs

A client-facing agency portal: project status, deliverable approvals, asset library, meeting booking and billing summary — branded per agency.

Client portal

White-labelled space per client.

Agency console

Projects, approvals queue and billing.

Mobile view

Read-and-approve experience for stakeholders.

Platforms listed describe the intended build. A specific engagement may narrow or extend them after scope approval.

E · Module inventory

Modules in the specification

  • Brand theming per agency
  • Project board and milestone tracker
  • Deliverable review and approval gate
  • Asset library with version history
  • Meeting booking
  • Invoice and receipt view

Capabilities the system is designed to provide

  • Give each client an authenticated space for their own project only
  • Gate delivery behind recorded approvals
  • Keep asset versions and approval evidence in one place
  • Expose invoices and receipts without emailing files

F · Screen gallery

No verified product screenshots for this concept

This project has not been built, so there are no application screenshots to show. The image on this page is a generated concept visual, not a capture of working software. Presenting it as a product screenshot would misrepresent the system, so this section says so explicitly.

Concept visual of an agency client portal with a project kanban board, brand asset tiles and an approval checklist on a dark navy background.
Generated concept visual — not a screenshot of a working application.

G · User journey

The intended path through the system

  1. Step 1

    Invite

    A client user is invited and scoped to one organisation.

  2. Step 2

    Review

    The client reads a deliverable and leaves feedback.

  3. Step 3

    Approve

    Approval is recorded with identity, timestamp and the exact version.

  4. Step 4

    Bill

    Approved work links to an invoice the client can view and settle.

H · Roles & permissions

Who can do what

Roles and their access boundary
RoleAccess boundary
Client viewerOwn organisation's projects and documents.
Client approverApproval actions for own organisation.
Account managerAssigned client organisations.
FinanceInvoices and payment status.

I · Architecture & API

Service boundary and HTTP surface

API endpoints
EndpointPurpose
POST /api/approvalsRecord an approval tied to a document version.
GET /api/client/projectsProjects scoped to the caller's organisation.
GET /api/invoices/:idSigned document access for permitted roles.

Endpoints are the intended contract. Authorisation is enforced server-side per role, never only in the interface.

J · Data entities

Core entities and relationships

Data entities
EntityRelationship
OrganisationHas many users and projects.
ProjectBelongs to one organisation.
ApprovalReferences one document version and one user.
InvoiceBelongs to a project; carries payment state.

K · External integrations

Provider-dependent integration points

  • SMTP
  • Calendar provider
  • File storage
  • Payment links
  • Object storage
  • Email invitations
  • Payment collection
  • E-signature

Each integration is configured and accepted against the specific provider account before go-live.

L · AI & automation

Opportunities and their human gate

Summarise feedback threads into a change list.

Human gate: Account manager confirms the list before it becomes tasks.

Draft project status updates from logged activity.

Human gate: Account manager edits and sends.

M · Security, privacy & accessibility

Controls the build is specified to enforce

  • Tenant isolation is enforced server-side on every request.
  • Invitations expire and are single-use.
  • Document downloads are authorised and logged.

Accessibility is treated as an acceptance criterion for keyboard, focus and contrast on every screen. No certification or audit result is implied.

N · Testing & quality assurance

What would have to be proven before handover

  • Cross-tenant access tests for every endpoint.
  • Invitation replay and expiry tests.
  • Approval version-binding tests.

O · Deployment & hosting

Where and how it would run

  • Containerised application
  • Object storage with signed URLs
  • Audit log retained per policy

P · Maintenance & scalability

Keeping it maintainable

  • Branding is configuration
  • Storage lifecycle rules
  • Approval records are immutable

Q · Optional advanced features

Out of the initial scope, available later

  • Per-client custom domains
  • SSO for enterprise clients
  • Statement of work e-signature

R · Related

Related solutions and next step

Sector blueprint: Agencies solutions

What this page does not claim: No client-retention or billing outcome is claimed. White-label domain and branding require separate configuration per agency.

Claims policy: this page is checked against a forbidden-claim list (6 patterns, including invented percentage results, “case study” and guarantee language) by the repository test suite.