Skip to content
Concept visual of a real estate CRM with a property listing grid, deal pipeline and client timeline on a dark navy background.
Real EstateSpecified

Real Estate CRM

Buyer timelines, site visits, bookings and instalments on one record.

Modules
6
Journey steps
4
Integrations
4
Indicative build
7–12 weeks

How to read this page: Concept specification: this page documents a system TECH360 can build. It is not a delivered client project, a verified case study, a working demonstration or a measured outcome.

B · Problem & target users

What this system is designed to replace

  • Buyer interest, site visits and instalments are tracked in different places.
  • Booking confirmations depend on a single agent's availability.
  • Instalment status is reconciled manually against bank records.

Target users

  • Sales agents
  • Site teams
  • Finance staff
  • Buyers

C · Objectives & intended benefits

Design intent, not measured outcomes

  • Keep one buyer record covering interest, visits, booking and instalments.
  • Record each site visit and its outcome against the property.
  • Track instalment schedules with verified payment references.

These are goals the build is designed to serve. No efficiency, revenue or conversion result is claimed.

D · Product overview

What the system is, and where it runs

A property sales CRM: enquiry capture per project, agent assignment, site-visit scheduling, booking and instalment tracking, plus management reporting.

Agent workspace

Pipeline, buyer timeline and follow-ups.

Finance view

Instalment schedules and verification queue.

Buyer portal

Own booking, schedule and receipts.

Platforms listed describe the intended build. A specific engagement may narrow or extend them after scope approval.

E · Module inventory

Modules in the specification

  • Project and unit inventory
  • Lead capture and agent assignment
  • Site-visit scheduling
  • Booking and instalment ledger
  • Document vault for agreements
  • Agent performance reporting

Capabilities the system is designed to provide

  • Tie every buyer interaction to one client timeline
  • Track unit availability without spreadsheet reconciliation
  • Schedule visits and log outcomes
  • Reconcile instalments against issued invoices

F · Screen gallery

No verified product screenshots for this concept

This project has not been built, so there are no application screenshots to show. The image on this page is a generated concept visual, not a capture of working software. Presenting it as a product screenshot would misrepresent the system, so this section says so explicitly.

Concept visual of a real estate CRM with a property listing grid, deal pipeline and client timeline on a dark navy background.
Generated concept visual — not a screenshot of a working application.

G · User journey

The intended path through the system

  1. Step 1

    Enquire

    Interest is captured against a specific unit and source.

  2. Step 2

    Visit

    A site visit is scheduled and its outcome recorded.

  3. Step 3

    Book

    A booking creates a payment schedule and reserves the unit.

  4. Step 4

    Collect

    Instalment payments are verified and receipts issued.

H · Roles & permissions

Who can do what

Roles and their access boundary
RoleAccess boundary
AgentOwn leads, visits and bookings.
FinanceSchedules, verification and receipts.
BuyerOwn unit, schedule and receipts.

I · Architecture & API

Service boundary and HTTP surface

API endpoints
EndpointPurpose
POST /api/bookingsReserve a unit and generate a schedule.
POST /api/instalments/:id/verifyRecord verified payment with a reference.
GET /api/buyer/scheduleOwn schedule and receipt list.

Endpoints are the intended contract. Authorisation is enforced server-side per role, never only in the interface.

J · Data entities

Core entities and relationships

Data entities
EntityRelationship
PropertyHas many units; a unit has one current booking.
BuyerHas many interactions and one active booking.
SiteVisitBelongs to a buyer and a property.
InstalmentBelongs to a booking; carries verification state.

K · External integrations

Provider-dependent integration points

  • Website property forms
  • WhatsApp follow-up
  • Email
  • Accounting export
  • Payment verification feed
  • SMS or messaging
  • Document storage

Each integration is configured and accepted against the specific provider account before go-live.

L · AI & automation

Opportunities and their human gate

Rank enquiries by stated budget and timeline fit.

Human gate: Agent decides contact order; rankings are advisory.

Draft instalment reminders.

Human gate: Finance approves the batch before sending.

M · Security, privacy & accessibility

Controls the build is specified to enforce

  • Buyers see only their own unit and schedule.
  • Payment verification requires a finance role and an evidence reference.
  • Unit reservations are transactional to prevent double booking.

Accessibility is treated as an acceptance criterion for keyboard, focus and contrast on every screen. No certification or audit result is implied.

N · Testing & quality assurance

What would have to be proven before handover

  • Concurrency test for unit reservation.
  • Schedule arithmetic tested against partial payments.
  • Cross-buyer access tests.

O · Deployment & hosting

Where and how it would run

  • Containerised application
  • Managed database
  • Scheduled reconciliation reports

P · Maintenance & scalability

Keeping it maintainable

  • Project and unit structures are configuration
  • Verification queue scales independently
  • Audit export for finance

Q · Optional advanced features

Out of the initial scope, available later

  • Document e-signature
  • Construction-milestone linking
  • Agent commission calculation

R · Related

Related solutions and next step

Sector blueprint: Real Estate solutions

What this page does not claim: No sales-performance or spreadsheet-reduction result is claimed. Listing data feeds depend on the portal or partner API available.

Claims policy: this page is checked against a forbidden-claim list (6 patterns, including invented percentage results, “case study” and guarantee language) by the repository test suite.